All services

Recruiting operations support

Candidate Sourcing Research Support

Build organized prospect lists from recruiter-approved role criteria, target companies, locations, and search channels.

Discuss this workflow
Candidate research workflow in practice

Where it helps

Recruiters lose selling and interviewing time when every search starts with manual list building and scattered notes.

Agencies with active searches that need a repeatable research queue without asking recruiters to surrender candidate judgment.

Service scope

Clear work in. Visible work out.

The role is designed around repeatable execution, reviewable evidence, and a named owner for every exception.

Support can perform
  • Research recruiter-approved profiles and target companies
  • Record public professional data in the approved worksheet or ATS
  • Tag prospects by role, location, and stated criteria
  • Flag incomplete or ambiguous records for recruiter review
Visible deliverables
  • Structured prospect list
  • Source links and research notes
  • Exception queue for recruiter review

What must be defined before work begins.

A reliable queue starts with approved inputs, not guesswork.

Search brief

Titles, locations, target companies, exclusions, and recruiter-approved search logic.

Research source

Approved databases, public profiles, directories, and the destination worksheet or ATS view.

Review rule

Required evidence, duplicate handling, missing-data rules, and the recruiter who reviews the list.

The operating loop

How the work moves.

Translate the brief

Turn approved criteria into a consistent research checklist without adding new requirements.

Build the longlist

Capture relevant public professional information and source links in the agreed format.

Check the record

Review required fields, duplicates, exclusions, and ambiguous matches before handoff.

Return the queue

Deliver review-ready prospects and isolate records that need recruiter judgment.

Quality controls

Speed only matters when the record stays trustworthy.

Candidate research quality-control illustration

Traceable sourcing

Every record points back to the source used.

Criteria fidelity

Tags reflect the written search brief, not assistant interpretation.

Duplicate control

Existing ATS records are checked before new entries are created.

Visible exceptions

Unclear titles, locations, and experience claims are flagged instead of guessed.

Human decision boundary

The assistant stops where judgment begins.

The recruiter defines the search criteria, reviews every prospect, and makes all outreach, screening, and hiring decisions.

Common ways to start.

Begin with a queue that is recurring, documented, and easy for your team to review.

New retained search

Create a structured first-pass market map while the recruiter sharpens the outreach strategy.

Hard-to-fill geography

Research adjacent titles and approved target employers across a defined location set.

Pipeline refresh

Recheck an existing prospect list for stale links, missing fields, and duplicate records.

Workflow FAQ

Questions to settle before launch.

Does the VA decide who is qualified?

No. The assistant researches against written criteria; a recruiter decides fit and next steps.

Can research be entered directly into our ATS?

Yes, when field rules, duplicate checks, permissions, and approval boundaries are documented.

Can the workflow support several open roles?

Yes. Each role should have its own approved criteria, destination queue, and reviewer.

DEFINE THE HANDOFF

Turn this workflow into dependable operating capacity.

Map your workflow